Surveyor Robotics Journal
   



email:
support@surveyor.com

web:
Surveyor Corporation

rss:
Subscribe

Archives
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
Februray 2006
January 2006

       
Tue, 07 Mar 2006

dongle version of SRV-1 base station radio

Well ... we got our fancy SMD rework station for attaching the Silicon Labs CP2102 USB to UART bridge chip on the SRV-1 base station radio board, and it really didn't work all that well, so we tried another method shown on the Spark Fun Electronics website. Hard to believe, but this worked really well. These guys are actually surface-mounting the same Silicon Labs chip in this tutorial. In case you're wondering, here's their version of a production solder reflow station -



I didn't take photos of our skillet, but it's nicer, as it doesn't have any sides that reach up and cause burns, though it didn't cost any more than their version. Here's the SRV-1 radio board with the CP2102 attached.



We're still testing this new design - we've already found one change to the circuit board, so initial robot shipments will go with the original radio shown with the other SRV-1 photos until this design is solid.

By the way, I should mention that there are 2 versions of these Zigbee radio modules - the one we're using has maximum RF power output of approximately 70 milliwatts, and pretty good range. The other version only outputs 1 milliwatt, so the range is maybe 70% less, but the cost drops by about 40%. We will eventually add an option for the lower cost version of the radio for users who don't need such a wide range and want to save some money.

Posted Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:25 | HTML Link | see additional stories ...